Original Jesus Journal

HomeLost Texts &

Gospel of Philip: Key Teachings About Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Sacraments

2026-04-05 · 9 min read

What Is the Gospel of Philip?

The Gospel of Philip is a Valentinian Gnostic text discovered in 1945 as part of the Nag Hammadi library in Upper Egypt. Unlike a narrative gospel, it reads more like a collection of theological reflections, aphorisms, and sacramental instructions — a kind of spiritual notebook compiled from Valentinian teachings. The manuscript dates to the third century CE, though the underlying traditions are likely older, originating in the mid-to-late second century.

The text is attributed to Philip the Apostle, though scholars universally agree it was not written by the biblical Philip. Attribution to apostolic figures was a common literary convention in early Christianity, meant to lend authority rather than indicate authorship. What makes this text remarkable is not who wrote it but what it contains: radical teachings on sacraments, gender, knowledge, and the relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

Jesus and Mary Magdalene in the Gospel of Philip

The Gospel of Philip contains the most discussed passage in all non-canonical literature about Jesus: 'The companion of the Savior is Mary Magdalene. Christ loved her more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on her [...].' The manuscript is damaged at the crucial word — the papyrus has a hole where the location of the kiss would be specified. Scholars have proposed 'mouth,' 'forehead,' and 'cheek' based on spacing and context.

The passage continues with the other disciples asking Jesus why he loves Mary more than them. Jesus responds with a parable: 'Why do I not love you like her? When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness, they are no different from one another. When the light comes, then the one who sees will see the light, and the one who is blind will remain in darkness.' The implication is that Mary sees what the other disciples cannot.

It is important to understand this passage in its Valentinian context. The 'kiss' in Gnostic thought was associated with the transmission of spiritual knowledge — initiates were said to conceive through a kiss, meaning they received gnosis (direct knowledge of the divine). Whether the text implies a romantic or physical relationship between Jesus and Mary is a question that scholars continue to debate, but the Valentinian framework suggests the intimacy described is primarily spiritual and initiatory.

The Five Sacraments of the Gospel of Philip

One of the most distinctive features of the Gospel of Philip is its description of five sacraments: baptism, chrism (anointing), eucharist, redemption, and the bridal chamber. The first three have parallels in mainstream Christianity. The last two are unique to Valentinian practice.

The sacrament of the bridal chamber is the most mysterious. Philip describes it as the highest sacrament, surpassing all others. 'The mysteries of truth are revealed in type and image,' the text says. 'The bridal chamber is hidden. It is the holy in the holy.' Scholars interpret this as a ritual of spiritual reunification — the soul reuniting with its divine counterpart, restoring the original wholeness that existed before the fall into material existence.

The text's sacramental theology is sophisticated and layered. Baptism cleanses, chrism illuminates, eucharist nourishes, but the bridal chamber transforms. Philip writes: 'Those who have united in the bridal chamber will no longer be separated.' This is not marriage in the conventional sense — it is the permanent union of the human and the divine within a single individual.

What would Jesus say about this?

Have a voice conversation with Jesus — reconstructed from 43 ancient sources, most of which never made it into the Bible.

Talk to the Original Jesus →

Key Theological Teachings

The Gospel of Philip contains dozens of striking theological statements. On names and reality: 'Names given to worldly things are very deceptive, for they divert our thoughts from what is correct to what is incorrect. Thus one who hears the word God does not perceive what is correct, but perceives what is incorrect.' The text argues that all human language is inadequate for divine reality — words are approximations that can mislead as easily as they illuminate.

On the nature of truth: 'Truth did not come into the world naked, but it came in types and images. The world will not receive truth in any other way.' This is a foundational Valentinian principle — that spiritual reality can only be communicated through symbol, metaphor, and ritual. Literal interpretation misses the point entirely.

On death and resurrection: 'Those who say they will die first and then rise are in error. If they do not first receive the resurrection while they live, when they die they will receive nothing.' This directly challenges the mainstream Christian understanding of resurrection as a future event after physical death. For Philip, resurrection is a present spiritual experience — an awakening that happens now or not at all.

The Gospel of Philip on Gender and Duality

Philip presents a theology of original unity that was fractured into duality. 'When Eve was still within Adam, death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more.' The fall, in this reading, is not about disobedience but about division — the splitting of a unified being into separate gendered halves.

This has profound implications for how Philip understands salvation. Redemption is reunification. The bridal chamber sacrament enacts this reunification symbolically and spiritually. Male and female are not permanent categories but symptoms of a cosmic fracture that can be healed. 'If the woman had not separated from the man, she should not die with the man. His separation became the beginning of death. Because of this, Christ came to repair the separation.'

Scholars like Jorunn Buckley and Deirdre Good have noted that Philip's gender theology, while rooted in ancient cosmology, contains a radical egalitarian impulse — the insistence that the gendered divisions of the material world are not ultimate realities but distortions of an original wholeness.

Historical Context and Valentinian Christianity

The Gospel of Philip belongs to the tradition of Valentinus, a second-century Egyptian Christian teacher who nearly became bishop of Rome. Valentinian Christianity was not a fringe movement — it was a serious contender for mainstream status throughout the second and third centuries. Valentinians attended the same churches as proto-orthodox Christians, participated in the same rituals, and read many of the same texts. They simply interpreted everything through a different theological lens.

The suppression of Valentinian Christianity was gradual and contested. Irenaeus devoted much of his five-volume 'Against Heresies' to refuting Valentinian ideas, which suggests how influential they were. Tertullian, Hippolytus, and Epiphanius also wrote extensive critiques. The energy spent attacking Valentinianism indicates that church leaders considered it a genuine threat to their version of the faith.

The Gospel of Philip gives us direct access to what Valentinians actually believed, in their own words, rather than through the hostile summaries of their opponents. This is why the Nag Hammadi discovery was so transformative for scholarship — for the first time, suppressed voices could speak for themselves.

Reading the Gospel of Philip Today

The Gospel of Philip challenges modern readers to rethink assumptions about what early Christianity was. It presents a version of the faith where sacraments are paths to self-knowledge, where gender is a temporary condition, where Mary Magdalene is the most advanced disciple, and where resurrection happens in this life or not at all. None of this is compatible with later orthodoxy, which is precisely why it was buried.

For anyone interested in the full range of what the earliest Christians believed about Jesus, the Gospel of Philip is essential reading. It is one of 43 ancient sources that preserve different facets of the Jesus tradition — each one a lens shaped by the community that produced it. You can explore all of these sources at originaljesus.io, where an AI trained on every surviving text helps you see what was actually written before the editorial process of orthodoxy decided what you were allowed to read.

Hear from the sources your Bible left out

43 ancient texts. One reconstructed voice. Have a real conversation with the historical Jesus — grounded in the earliest surviving records, not modern interpretation.

Start a conversation

Keep reading

The Gospel of Judas: What It Actually Says About Jesus and Betrayal What the Gospel of Mary Magdalene Actually Says What Is the Gospel of Thomas? The Lost Sayings of Jesus What Are the Gnostic Gospels? A Guide to the Texts Your Bible Left Out Infancy Gospel of Thomas: Stories of Jesus as a Dangerous, Miraculous Child